Adobe Throws Photographers Under the Bus Again: ‘Skip the Photoshoot’
May 3, 2024 18:59:37 #
https://petapixel.com/2024/05/03/adobe-throws-photographers-under-the-bus-again-skip-the-photoshoot/
May 3, 2024 19:01:32 #
May 3, 2024 22:10:05 #
I had an article to write for a newsletter in our retirement community. It needed an image because all the good articles in the monthly news letter has an image. I want some sort of happy, older person at a beach or in the wilderness with a camera.
I didn't have such an image. I didn't want to shoot such an image. I don't have an account at any stock photo agency. I didn't want any of my neighbors to be identifiable.
Adobe Firefly to the rescue! Before the newsletter people threw me under their bus, I came up with a humorous image that fit the article.
I see it that Adobe provided me with something both fun and useful.
I didn't have such an image. I didn't want to shoot such an image. I don't have an account at any stock photo agency. I didn't want any of my neighbors to be identifiable.
Adobe Firefly to the rescue! Before the newsletter people threw me under their bus, I came up with a humorous image that fit the article.
I see it that Adobe provided me with something both fun and useful.
Check out Smartphone Photography section of our forum.
May 4, 2024 10:42:24 #
May 4, 2024 19:13:04 #
bsprague wrote:
I had an article to write for a newsletter in our retirement community...
...Adobe Firefly to the rescue! Before the newsletter people threw me under their bus, I came up with a humorous image that fit the article.
I see it that Adobe provided me with something both fun and useful.
...Adobe Firefly to the rescue! Before the newsletter people threw me under their bus, I came up with a humorous image that fit the article.
I see it that Adobe provided me with something both fun and useful.
And it didn't require a model release.
May 4, 2024 21:25:07 #
May 4, 2024 21:34:00 #
bsprague wrote:
I had an article to write for a newsletter in our ... (show quote)
What you did is exactly what the author was talking about.
Check out Infrared Photography section of our forum.
May 5, 2024 10:30:07 #
Mac wrote:
What you did is exactly what the author was talking about.
Yes, except that that author is arguing that Adobe "threw him under the bus". My argument is that Adobe has provided new tools for me to use at no additional cost. In other words, this is good, not bad.
May 5, 2024 11:26:50 #
bsprague wrote:
Yes, except that that author is arguing that Adobe "threw him under the bus". My argument is that Adobe has provided new tools for me to use at no additional cost. In other words, this is good, not bad.
What Adobe did was give you the tools to “Skip the photoshoot”. That was the point of the article.
May 5, 2024 11:30:57 #
Save money as you don't have to buy cameras. They actually wanna kill camera manufacturers.
For me it would be great. I would be able to afford the camera I want.
For me it would be great. I would be able to afford the camera I want.
May 5, 2024 21:39:15 #
StanMac
Loc: Tennessee
Off topic, but I think it’s time we stopped the “X, formerly known as Twitter” moniker - it’s annoying.
Stan
Stan
Check out Sports Photography section of our forum.
May 6, 2024 06:48:28 #
BebuLamar wrote:
Save money as you don't have to buy cameras. They actually wanna kill camera manufacturers.
For me it would be great. I would be able to afford the camera I want.
For me it would be great. I would be able to afford the camera I want.
But there would be no innovation in cameras if that happened.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Check out Astronomical Photography Forum section of our forum.